Question raised by: Gregory Levine
Discussants: Matthew Stavros, David Pollack, Carol Tsang, Robin Gill, Lawrence Marceau, Todd Brown, Keller Kimbrough
return to archive index | top pmjs index
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:47:52 -0700
From: Gregory Levine <gplevine@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Subject: "Iconoclasm" in Premodern Japan
Dear Colleagues,
I am currently doing research on the breaking and abuse of
visual images in premodern Japan, especially religious images,
and would be grateful for any
references, especially in primary sources, to incidents of or
doctrinal/philosophical postures concerning "iconoclasm"
in Japan. I would also welcome references that point us toward
an indigenous lexicon for "iconoclasm" in Japan and
in other visual cultures in Asia.
Most of us are no doubt familiar with the Nihon shoki entry for 552 (referring to the Buddhist icon thrown into the Naniwa canal and its temple being torched). Also familiar [thanks to the work of James Ketelaar, Martin Collcutt, Christine Guth, and others] is the landscape of dismantled and ruined temples and destroyed or dispersed icons and texts emerging during the persecution of Buddhism in late Edo-early Meiji.
I'm sure there are other important moments in which sacred sites and their images were disrupted or destroyed as well as particular sectarian/philosophical positions. (We might differentiate the destruction of santuaries as collateral damage during civil war-- as in Oda Nobunaga's assault on Enryakuji-- from direct disputes over the presence of images and representation of the divine.)
Greg Levine
Assistant Professor of Japanese art history
Department of History of Art
U.C. Berkeley
416 Doe Library #6020
Berkeley, CA 94720-6020
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 20:27:29 -0400
From: Matthew Stavros
Subject: Re: "Iconoclasm" in Premodern Japan
Greetings Greg senpai,
Just the other day I read the Jurgin Elisonas article in Cambridge History, vol. 4, chap. 7, "Christianity and the Daimyo." It gives highlights several cases when "native" Japanese religious imagery and architecture was destroyed (primarily in Kyushu) by late sengoku daimyo at the behest of their Christian mentors. You might want to check it out for references to primary sources.
I send my best,
Matthew Stavros
Greg,
I wonder if, in literature and certain forms of art, mitate might not amount to a type of iconoclasm? This would understand the practice of honkadori or other respectful allusion as a sort of elevation of the icon, and mitate as its deliberate 'breaking.' True, we usually don't think of iconoclasm as eliciting humor, but it does, and humor isn't the sole function of mitate, which can also be done for more serious purposes of disguise, satire, and for various sly and/or malevolent intentions. As it develops in the Edo period, at any rate, it seems to me that mitate becomes a very complex and inclusive mechanism that does at least part of what we think of when we use the word iconoclasm. Not the religious part, perhaps or alas, but a send-up, parody, nose-thumbing, akanbei sort of attitude toward established pieties. Find a piety or convention and you'll find its mitate. You might have some trouble locating this attitude in the sort of arts you had in mind though.
David Pollack
There are numerous examples of temples being sacked in the
history of the
Honganji branch of Jodo Shinshu.
The destruction of the first Honganji, in 1465, by Enryakuji.
See the
works Honpukuji Yuraiki (pp. 329-32) and Honpukuji atogaki (pp.
364-6).
Page numbers refer to the publication called Honpukuji kyuki,
ed. Chiba
Joryu, although there are other printed versions, e.g. in Shinshu
Shiryo
Shusei.
Another example is the attack on Kofukuji by Honganji adherents,
on
1532/7/17. Courtiers' diaries referring to this include: Nijoji
shuka-ki,
Ganjo onenki, Nisui-ki and Hisamichi ko-ki. For Nijoji shuka=ki,for
example, look at entries from that date--7/17--to at least 8/9.
As far as
I know, though, it's only available in Zoku nangyo zatsuroku,
which I
found at Todai shiryohensanjo. Maybe somebody else knows of a
printed
version.
And, of course, there's the razing of the Yamashina Honganji
in 1532 by
Nichiren adherents and Rokkaku Sadayori, though these belong rather
more
to the civil-war collateral-damage category, even if the Nichiren
people
used religious beliefs to justify the attack. Come to think of
it, there's
the virtual destruction (temporarily) of the Nichiren sect in
Kyoto later
in the 1530s by Enryakuji and Rokkaku Sadayori (at least I think
it's that
Rokkaku). I don't have primary references to that close at hand,
but you
should look through Imatani Akira's Tembun Hokke no Ran (Heibonsha,
1989).
"Ikkoshu" (generally taken to mean Honganji-branch)
were also infamous in
the late fifteenth century for their alleged destruction of Buddhist
images and idols. A good starting place to look for that, and
a good
discussion of why I say "generally taken to mean" in
James Dobbins's
Jodo Shinshu (Indiana UP, 1989).
One or more of these incidents may be of interest to you.
Carol Tsang
Assistant Professor
Department of History
University of Illinois at Chicago
In respect to Greg Levine's call for examples of iconoclasm:
Extremely sad yet entertaining reading on the destruction of religious
sculpture by the jesuits and their converts may be found in frois's
NIHONSHI, the ten or so volumes of which, if i remember right,
may be found at the university of washington, which was kind enough
to let me borrow it very cheaply once by interlibrary loan, (and
may be at OSU, too) --- i mean there are spectacular expeditions
to steal them from caves and exultation over heads flying into
privies, etc.
The best symbol of the playful iconoclism suggested by David Pollack
that comes to mind would be micturation on the shinto mark (torii),
which every modern cartoonist worth his salt has depicted. I
have an old senryu about doing the same somewhere around here
and will send it when/if it is found.
robin d gill
I'm not sure whether this is what Gregory Levine is looking
for, but
"doctrinal/philosophical postures concerning iconoclasm"
might include
just about any of the positions made by non-Hayashi-School Confucian
and
nativist scholars during the early modern period.
One well-known article with the term "iconoclast"
in the title is
Shuichi Kato's "Tominaga Nakamoto, 1715-46: A Tokugawa Iconoclast."
(MN
22). This includes an English translation of Tominaga's "Okina
no fumi".
E. Herbert Norman (1949) and Yasunaga Toshinobu (1992)
have
demonstrated that Ando^ Sho^eki held strongly critical beliefs
concerning
the role of the state.
James McMullen, in his _Idealism, Protest, and The Tale
of Genji_
(1999), focuses on the protest aspects of Kumazawa Banzan's Confucian
thought.
From the Christian perspective, _Deus Destroyed_ (1973)
is a good
source for anti-Buddhist diatribes.
Beatrice Bodart-Bailey published "The Persecution
of Confucianism in
Tokugawa Japan" in MN 48.3 (1993).
The 18th-century writer Baba Bunko^ (nꕶk, d. 1718-58)
was one of
the few writers put to death for his writings critical of the
regime.
Finally, while all gesaku could be construed as being iconoclastic,
the yomihon fiction of Ueda Akinari has a strong anti-establishment
flavor to it, whether it is the military regime, the Nara and
early Heian
court, or organized religion.
The list goes on to peasant protest, uchikowashi, etc.,
but I'll stop
here.
Lawrence Marceau
Greg,
You're probably already aware of this, but _Shasekishuu_ (1:10)
contains an
interesting reference to nenbutsu practitioners who express their
exclusive
devotion to Amida by rubbing _tade_ ("smartweed" in
Robert Morrell's
translation) on the heads of images of Jizou. The reference is
brief and
the precise significance of this act is not made clear, but it
is said to
reflect the belief (not shared by Mujuu Ichien, of course) that
Buddhist
deities other than Amida are "useless" (_itazuramono_).
The fact that the
same passage also discusses related practices, such as throwing
copies of
the _Lotus Sutra_ into rivers, may make it useful in situating
iconoclasm
per se with respect to other expressions of impiety. (On the other
hand, I
suppose one might argue that in the medieval Japanese context,
Buddhist
scriptures -- or at least, some scriptures, such as the _Lotus_
-- had
enough in common with religious icons to require that any definition
of
"iconoclasm" be sufficiently broad to include their
desecration or
destruction.)
A rather different but perhaps relevant phenomenon is the conversion
of
statues of other Buddhas into statues of Amida by removing their
hands or
fingers and replacing them with new ones positioned in _mudra_
associated
with Amida. Though as a rule this was probably not intended as
"iconoclastic" by those who did it, it certainly struck
at least one
observer as blasphemous -- in his _Risshou ankoku ron_, Nichiren
excoriates
those guilty of this and other heretical practices inspired by
Honen's
teachings for "destroying" the Buddha, the Dharma, and
the priesthood.
(_Risshou ankoku ron_, T. no. 2688, 84:207b9-14; this passage
is translated
in p. 35-36 of Philip Yampolsky's _Selected Writings of Nichiren_).
Nichiren's comments may also be of use in your search for an indigenous
lexicon for "iconoclasm" and for information on how
iconoclasm was
perceived. The work is a polemic and the passage in question contains
a
certain amount of hyperbole (the practices corresponding to "the
destruction of the Dharma" and "the destruction of the
priesthood" are
copying the Pure Land sutras instead of the _Lotus_ and substituting
lectures on Shan-tao's writings for lectures on Chih-i's). Nonetheless,
Nichiren's identification of the image with the deity depicted
(he writes
not of those who modify statues, but of those who "cut off
Shaka's hands
and fingers") was certainly not unique, and I suspect that
he would not
have been alone in equating the desecration of a statue of Sakyamuni
with
the "destruction of the Buddha" (_habutsu_) himself.
I hope these references will be of at least some use to you
(and won't
reach you only after a dozen or so other PMJS subscribers supply
the same
information). This is a fascinating topic, and I look forward
to the
results of your research.
Todd Brown
Hello Everyone,
Todd Brown's description of the "conversion" (mutilation)
of Buddhist
images to "make them Amida" reminded me of a point that
Ikegami Jun'ichi
makes in his kaisetsu to the setsuwa anthology _Sangoku denki_
("Chusei no
bungaku" series, Miyai Shoten, 1982, vol. 2, p. 3-8). Manuscripts
in the
woodblock-printed _Sangoku denki_ textual line contain strong
Pure Land
elements that the National Library text does not. Ikegami argues
that
these discrepancies--including, for example, substitutions of
Amida for
Shakyamuni, the Three Pure Land Sutras for the Lotus Sutra, and
chanting of
the nenbutsu for copying out the Lotus Sutra--are the result of
a pro-Pure
Land copyist's attempt to subvert the original, largely Tendai-Lotus
tone
of the anthology. Like the physical alteration of statues, this
kind of
textual disfigurement may or may not constitute iconoclasm, depending
on
how broadly one defines the term.
Best,
Keller Kimbrough
return to archive index | top pmjs index
complete as of 2001/07/16