![]() |
Ichigaya Campus of Sophia University
|
||||
|
Index ASCJ
Executive Committee Contact the organizers: Asian Studies Conference (ASCJ) c/o Institute of Asian Cultural Studies, International Christian University 3-10-2 Osawa, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo 181 |
Session 4: Room 307 Japan and the Liberal World Order: Finance, Power, and Ideology from the 1890s to the 1940s Organizer: Mark Metzler, Oakland University and University of Tokyo 1) Steven Bryan, Columbia University and University of Tokyo In the 1890s Japan joined a flood of other non-European nations in adopting the gold standard. Viewed today as the epitome of a globalized world economy, gold for Japan--and other nations--represented as much a turn to nationalism as it did a turn to internationalism. As a form of industrial policy to spur exports, promote industry and consolidate empire, gold in the 1890s was a means to compete with Europe and the U.S. as much as it was a means to join the Euro/U.S. world order. Whereas bimetallism represented a cooperative, international world order, gold for many was a way to preserve trade and industrial advantages. Far from being the epitome of an emergent international liberalism, gold was a bulwark against exactly such a world order. 2) Simon James Bytheway, Nihon University The government of Terauchi Masatake authorised a series of large capital loans to Britain, France, Russia and China during the latter half of World War I. Very little is known about these loans and the diplomacy that surrounds them, leading to misinformation and myth inside and especially outside of Japan. Indeed, very little is known of Japan's experience as a creditor nation in the World War I period. What were Japan's aims in attempting to become a major creditor nation? How were Britain, France, Russia and China able to attract and utilize Japanese capital? What were the effects of this massive lending upon Japan' s own economic and financial development? My research addresses these questions and attempts to shed light on an important area of Japanese economic history. 3) Mark Metzler, Oakland University and University of Tokyo In 1919, the international positions of booming, victorious Japan and hungry, defeated Germany could hardly have seemed more different. By the mid-1930s, their positions came to seem quite similar. Understanding this likeness inevitably requires a consideration of global structural factors. This paper addresses the parallel experiences of the failure of liberalism and "rebellion" against the west in these distant Axis partners by reference to the international financial positions of both countries, particularly in respect to the United States. By placing the problem of international financial relations where it belongs--at the center of the history of the era--new elements of unity are revealed in these widely separated movements. 4) Tadashi Anno, Sophia University, Faculty of Comparative Culture Two factors have complicated the analysis of the ideological dimensions of Japan's challenge to the liberal world order in the 1930s and early '40s: first, the opportunistic character of Japanese foreign policy; second, the ambiguity of the ideologies themselves. This paper argues that part of the confusion derives from the actual ambiguities of Japan's position in the liberal world order. Focusing on Japan's ambiguous position allows us to identify and to disentangle distinct components of Japanese ideology, which persist and reappear in different forms despite opportunistic changes in policies. Disentangling these components also opens the way for more fruitful comparisons with other Axis powers. |
||||
|
|