There are 10 bottom baryon masses with reasonable experimental accuracies [1] and wonderful agreement with our computed values of 1994 [2]. There were no reliable experimental values of bottom baryon masses at that time. So we used values of parameters in Ref. [3]; quark masses m_u, m_d, m_s, m_c, the gluon coupling constant α_s, the harmonic oscilator constand K, quark distance modifieing constant κ　and a constant energy E₀. As for the bottom quark mass m_b, we used the value given by the meson spectroscopy [4]. Including experimental values of bottom baryons in our parameter fit, we can get more reasonable computed values.

As given in Refs. [2, 3 and 5], we modify the wave functions of the exact solutions of the three-body Schrödinger equations of the harmonic-oscillator potential by the forces caused of the Fermi-Breit terms and compute the baryon masses as the expectation values of the Hamiltonian which contain the relativistic kinetic terms.

As given in the following Table I, our computed values of masses of 16 light baryons, 15 charmed baryons, and 10 bottom baryons fit to the experimental values within ±8.3 MeV. The experimental data are those of Ref. [1]. The fit was ±9.0 MeV for 22 particles in Ref. [3], ±8.5 MeV for 30 particles in Ref. [5], and now, ±8.3 MeV for 41 particles, owing to improved experiments. We expect farther improvements. The computer program baryon2021.cpp, Visual C++:: Console Program, is here. We can use C++ in the Visual Studio [6].

As we discussed in Ref. [2],

Σ_b > Ξ_b.

It is crucial to discuss quark distances to get this result; spin-spin interactions dippend on qubic inverse of quark distances [3].

As for Ω_b^-, it is important to find a γ from

Ω_b^-{bss} -> Ω_b^-b{ss} + γ.